It would appear that our decade’s as-of-now trend of “high schools treating gay students terribly, and refusing to clean up their act until the ACLU gets involved” is still going strong! But that’s not actually that bad, because God bless the ACLU, they are pretty willing to get involved. As you may remember, the ACLU created a checklist survey for high school students to report whether their schools blocked access to sites that may have provided necessary support and information for gay students, like GLSEN or PFLAG, because they were “inappropriate.”

Now we’re seeing the first tangible result of their campaign – a major California web filtering company is dropping a filtering category that allowed schools in Missouri and elsewhere to block educational gay, lesbian and transgender sites. The ACLU has so far sent letters to at least 15 districts asking them to stop filtering educational LGBT sites. Many of them seem to be claiming that the blocking is unintentional, and it may be true; the web filtering company, Lightspeed Systems, says that when they’ve contacted customers about the upcoming change the response has been “overwhelmingly positive.”

“Many of these school districts had either activated the filter without realizing what it does or had activated it by accident,” [Joshua Block, the staff attorney for the ACLU’s Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender & AIDS Project], said. “I think that the vast majority of school districts are trying in good faith to protect their students and didn’t have any desire to discriminate against gay content. I think this really shows that these filters don’t really serve the needs of the clients and if anything they work against the needs of the client.”

The North Kansas City School District has blamed technical problems for the blocking of LGBT sites. After learning of the issue it unblocked the entire category and said in a statement the changes to Lightspeed would have made it easier to manage the system. Northfield Public Schools Superintendent Chris Richardson said a technician turned on the filter because he thought it blocked sexually explicit material. After a staff member pointed out that educational LGBT sites were being blocked, the district tried to fix the problem but wound up only giving access to staff.

So, it seems there may well be a second story here – something about how under-staffed, under-trained and generally poorly resourced many public schools are? And how this hurts all kids, but perhaps ones that are already marginalized in some way the most? Still, though, regardless of the intentions of the school districts, it seems unfortunate that they had to be essentially threatened with legal action before looking into this problem – shouldn’t the needs of the student body have been enough?

It may seem like a trivial point, but in the real world of high school, access to information and support may be even more important in terms of keeping gay kids alive than videos of celebrities telling you how it gets better. Feeling completely alone in the world and not being able to get any answers about what it means to be gay, especially if you live in a home where these aren’t acceptable topics to bring up, is incredibly isolating. The phase of obsessively Googling “am I a lesbian??” is a nearly universal one, and if every time a student tries it they get a page saying “blocked for inappropriate content,” why wouldn’t it make their shame and self-loathing even worse? Kudos to the ACLU for making high school more survivable, and to these high schools for allowing them to.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!